Thursday, January 21, 2016

The Enchanting Standalone Novels of Eloisa James - Part 2


In The Ugly Duchess (2012), an ugly duckling transforms herself into a swan with still tender scars underneath her glorious feathers and, in a reverse move, a handsome, popular swan transforms himself into a scarred ruffian shorn of his feathers. This is one of the most beautifully crafted romances I have ever read. Theodora Saxby, the title character, is the antithesis of the prevailing idea of feminine beauty. She’s not dainty or curvy or even very feminine. She’s tall, thin, and small-bosomed with strong features. Not her mother’s insistence that Theo wear pink ruffles and pearls, nor the fortune Theo inherited from her father makes her more acceptable. She feels ugly and ill-at-ease, and she accepts society’s valuation that she looks like a man. In the Hans Christian Andersen tale that inspired this romance, the ugly duckling’s mother insists, “He is my own child, and he is not so very ugly after all if you look at him properly.” Theo has two people in her life who look at her properly, her mother and her life-long friend, James Ryburn, the son of her dead father’s best friend. Her mother and James look at Theo with love, and to them, she is beautiful. James even rejects the masculine diminutive that Theodora has adopted as her name and calls her Daisy, emphasizing his view of her as lovely and feminine.

James Ryburn is broad-shouldered, handsome, and likeable, the kind of young man who leaves young girls giggling and sighing in his wake. He’s not concerned with society’s acceptance or comfortable being a duke’s heir, but there is no question that he would be courted and celebrated if he bothered to attend social gatherings. When his father confesses that he has gambled away all his own funds and a sizeable chunk of Theo’s, James is angry. When the Duke demands that his son marry Theo to hide the crime, James is mad with fury.  The Duke’s demand and James’s response to it interferes with the natural progression of the relationship of Theo and James.

The story turns into one of the marriage-in-trouble tales at which Eloisa James excels. Theodora and her hero are heartbreakingly young when they part, but as tragic as the separation is, it allows both of them to experience transformation. Theo retreats to the Ryburn country estate and uses her considerable intelligence to repair the damage the Duke’s gambling has done to the family fortunes. Her physical transformation comes only after years have passed, it comes at the time she chooses, and she uses her own sense of texture, line, and color to effect it. After she has captured Paris, she conquers London. That she does so in a cape made of “gorgeous swansdown” is the perfect touch.
           
            The woman poised at the top of the stairs, looking down at all of them with a little smile that indicated absolute self-confidence, looked like a goddess who happened to come           down to earth by way of Paris. She radiated that sort of ineffable glamour that simply cannot be learned. . .

As for James, upon his return he is no longer “a pretty voice and a handsome face.” In fact, his skin is so bronzed that those who look at him aren’t even sure that he’s an Englishman. His hair has grown since he shaved his head, but it’s still shorter than any self-respecting gentleman’s should be. He describes himself as “tattooed and scarred, and bigger than hell.” Even his voice has changed, thanks to a pirate who cut his throat. He has seen and done things the young Earl of Islay could not have imagined.

The wonder in this story is not that James and his Daisy find their HEA but that for James, who has always seen Daisy as beautiful, this is not really an ugly duckling tale after all.


Once Upon a Tower (2013), based upon the story of Rapunzel, is the fifth and final of the fairytale romances. James, a Shakespeare professor in her academic life, has described it as “a Romeo meets Rapunzel mash-up,” adding that the idea for the novel came from her pondering “what Romeo and Juliet’s marriage would look like if their parents hadn't been so grumpy.” The novel’s hero and heroine, Gowan Stoughton of Craigievar, Duke of Kinross, Chief of Clan MacAulay, and Lady Edith Gilchrist, are older than Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, but they are still very young: he is twenty-two, and she is nineteen when they meet. Like Romeo, Gowan falls in love at first sight.

Again, James does a marvelous job of weaving elements of the original tale into her story even as she adds twists to render her re-vision unique. Edie is beautiful like Rapunzel. In fact Gowan’s comparison of her hair to the “golden apples of the sun” echoes the description from the Grimm Brothers’ tale (1812) that calls Rapunzel “the most beautiful child under the sun.”  Rapunzel is musical as well. It is her voice that first enchants the king’s son. Edie is a cellist rather than a singer, but her playing enchants Gowan the first time he hears her. Rapunzel and her prince marry, but they must overcome obstacles before they begin their HEA. Edie and Gowan’s story follows the same pattern. The prince wanders blind, weeping over the loss of his wife. Gowan’s blindness is metaphoric, but he too wanders and weeps for the same cause.  And in both stories, the wife’s tears are healing.

The twist comes with the tower. Rapunzel is shut into a tower that “had neither stairs nor door, but quite at the top was a little window.” The tower sounds similar to Edie’s, but Edie chooses to shut herself into her tower rather than being imprisoned there by an enchantress.  Readers with a Freudian leaning may see the tower as a phallic symbol. I was more interested in seeing Edie’s making choices and taking action as evidence of her maturing and recognizing her autonomy, qualities that link Edie more closely to Charlotte Rose de Caumont de la Force’s version of the tale, "Persinette"  (1697).

I think James doesn’t get enough credit for the skill with which she uses details of clothing, not merely as descriptive detail but to reveal something significant or to provoke an incident. I love what she does with The Dress in this book. I can’t say too much about this without moving into spoiler territory, but readers will understand the importance of The Dress--the one that makes you look the way you want to look, the one that affects him exactly the way you want it too. Edie wears such a dress. It is “China rose. . . . Darker than cinnabar, more saturated than claret . . . well, close to claret.”  It is amazing, and it leads to a Moment. The only other thing I’m going to say is that nobody can make a kiss on the hand as sexy as Eloisa James does.


That brings us to My American Duchess, EJ’s January 26 release. Although it is not a fairytale novel, with its plot of an American heiress who arrives in London in search of a husband and ends up a duchess to her great surprise, it certainly has a fairytale quality. James combines a handful of proven tropes in this one: love at first sight, twins, love triangle, and marriage in trouble as well as the obvious American in London. If you know James’s work, you will not be surprised that she gives each of these a twist that makes it her own.

We have seen runaway-bride romances, but My American Duchess is runaway-ex-fiancée-romance. Merry Pelford has run away from two broken engagements and a reputation as a fickle heartbreaker. Her reputation cannot survive another broken engagement, but it is clear to the reader from the opening of the novel that this is the direction in which Merry is headed. But then James gives the storyline a couple of unexpected turns that create moments of anxiety and elation for the reader.

Merry is something of a paradox. She is both confident and insecure, both proud of her Americanness and at times apologetic for her Yankee uncouthness. Regardless, she is delightful and engaging. Trent is the reserved duke, not arrogant exactly but nonetheless fully aware of who he is and the ways in which his dukedom defines him. He needs Merry, something he realizes subconsciously from the time he first sees her. I loved both these characters and who they become with each other.  Of course, that reaction is pretty much a given since this is an Eloisa James book.

I have referred to these six books as standalones, and I hold to that in the sense that each gives its readers a world complete and satisfying within itself. But three of the fairytale books—A Kiss at Midnight, The Duke Is Mine, and The Ugly Duckling—have connected novellas, and the final sentence of My American Duchess can be interpreted as a hint that there will be a novel or novella connected to Merry and Trent’s world.

~Janga


Do you prefer standalones or connected novels?

Which of EJ’s fairytale novels most surprised you?

What other fairy tale would you like to see EJ use as inspiration for a romance novel?

Janga will send one randomly chosen person leaving a comment one book of their choice from the Eloisa James books spotlighted in parts one and two. (U.S. addresses only)

26 comments:

  1. I like both standalones and connected novels. I have been reading many series lately, in part because I enjoy visiting characters from past books I have read. Standalones are nice though because when you are done, you are DONE. You are sitting around waiting for the next one to complete or add to the story. I think her using HOUSE as an "inspiration" for her hero in WHEN BEAUTY TAMED THE BEAST was a bit of a surprise. I would like to see what she would do with Hansel and Gretel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm with you on enjoying both, Pat. I am a series addict, but that doesn't mean I can't appreciate a standalone--especially when they are as wonderful as EJ's are.

      Delete
  2. This is wonderful. I enjoy standalone and connected stories. I enjoyed learning about these memorable fairytales which interest me greatly. A fairytale which I love and think is very special is Thumbelina.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, traveler, I'd love to see what EJ could do with Thumbelina! What great possibilities for a vivid assortment of characters. Of course, the flower king would need major development. Like so many fairytale heroes, he is not very interesting in the original.

      Delete
  3. I appreciate both series and standalone novels because sometimes youfeel like reading a standalone and then sometimes you want the series to continue with other background characters. I haven't read much Eloisa James books however from the ones I did read i was surprised at Once Upon a Tower because it's so unusual for authors to write about Rapunzel. .. I'd love for her to write a story about Pocahontas I grew up admiring her and her fierce warrior strength for a princess and i had everything from socks to boots to clothes to bags with pocahontas themed lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Natasha, have you read Mary Jo Putney's Angel Rogue? Maxima Collins is no Pocahuntas, but she is half-Mohawk and an unusual heroine.

      Delete
    2. No I haven't I will check it out thanks for the recommendation

      Delete
    3. No I haven't I will check it out thanks for the recommendation

      Delete
  4. I'd like to see Eloisa James take on Hansel and Gretel, but not sure how you can get an HEA out that! I have read both the series and the standalone books. Looking forward to My American Duchess.

    Thanks for the overview, Janga!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Laura, I predict you will love My American Duchess. Everyone I know who has already read it does.

      Delete
  5. I usually prefer standalones, but I have read some wonderful series too. Fairy tale romances are a favorite trope of mine, and EJ has written some of the best. Her version of Beauty and the Beast was the most surprising to me because of the physical transformation of "Beauty." It was an interesting twist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When Beauty Tamed the Beast seems to be the most popular of the group, Cheryl. I think it is the unexpected twists in all the novels that make them so memorable. It's not exactly a fairy tale, but I'd love to see EJ's version of the Pygmalion myth. So much room in that one for feminist revision.

      Delete
  6. I enjoy both standalones and interconnected stories. With interconnected books, however, an author has more time to develop characters and plots. I enjoy watching Once Upon a Time. It would be interesting to see how Eloisa James could reform the Grimm's version of Rumpelstiltskin into a hero.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I read both types but like to be able read each book if I have not kept up with the series

    ReplyDelete
  8. Connected Novels are always appealing but my love is for standalone novels. Fairytales are so thought provoking. One that has fascinated me is The Frog Prince.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I actually like both, standalone has its benefit in that I don't have to anxiously waiting a year or two to find out more later, but series are fun too, especially when there are supporting and minor characters from the first book that could keep the stories/saga going, and they can take turns having their own stories to tell.

    EJ's fairy tales most surprised me? Well, I think I have a tie here. The Ugly Duchess and Once Upon A Tower. EJ made them much better than the others by adding, giving other elements (of surprises), unique twists or qualities to the characters, definitely more interesting than the original fairy tales.

    Which other fairy tale(s) would I like to see? "The Three Musketeers" Or "....Musketeeresses", of course. I imagine it would be soooooo fun to read this series. A bit feisty, a bit tomboyish young ladies, a bit daring, a warrior, good with swords, bow & arrow, or never miss shooting a bull-eye out, confident and brave, a hellish raising havoc if need be with lots of potential for good laugh in this series.... a band of girls, you know. I could just picture them all out! Will be great fun to read, really. ;) :D

    ReplyDelete
  10. I confess that I'm more a fan of connected books. It seems like you get more bang for your buck when you're in the middle of a series. You not only get the romance but all the other relationships that go into creating that world. Also, if you're lucky you keep getting glimpses of your favorite characters and their HEA.

    I can't think of another fairy tale that EJ could put her special spin on. Beauty and the Beast is my favorite followed closely by Cinderella and for some reason I seemed to have missed EJ's When Beauty Tamed the Beast. I'll have to remedy that! LOL

    ReplyDelete
  11. I enjoy both standalones and connected books. (When you're as talented an author as Eloisa James, it's all worth reading!) So...I've read all of the Eloisa books you discussed, except for the new one. Most rank high on my Goodreads shelf. My favorites are When Beauty Tamed the Beast and A Kiss at Midnight. As to another fairy tale trope--how about Sleeping Beauty, with "beauty" as the hero? Thanks, Janga; I enjoyed these posts.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I enjoy both!.. Give me more Bridgerton books!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks for both yesterday's and today's posts, Janga. They have made me want to go back and re-read all of the books you spotlighted!

    You know how much I love a series (for the reasons you've stated) but I also enjoy standalones. Sometimes I just want a one and done. ;-)

    I enjoyed all of EJ's fairytale romances but the first, At Kiss at Midnight remains my favorite.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I like both stand alones (sometimes I'm not going to have a lot of time for reading so I want the resolution)& connected or series (it's fun to revisit from characters in the earlier books, but I do want to read the stories in order so that can take more planning).

    ReplyDelete
  15. I love reading both. I appreciate connected novels, and love reading the stories for all the characters, however when there are a lot of books it can be a bit of a pain (not to mention expensive) to try to follow the entire story arc.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I really prefer stand alone novels. Series are nice if they are published very close together, otherwise, my "brain leaks" and I have to read my review to reacquaint myself with the characters and plot.

    I was thinking about fairy tale-themed books the other day and wondered if Pinocchio could be used somehow. Since authors usually focus on female fairy tale characters, an ignored young woman who dreamed of being a spectacular person or even a hero who started out as a "nothing" and ended up being a hunk. Ha-Ha! I'm rattling on here. It's a good thing I'm not a writer. :-)

    I can't think of an EJ book that actually "surprised" me.

    Just a note to everyone wherever you live, please be careful with the storms going through the country. Stay inside and be safe. This is reading weather. Take advantage of it!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I enjoy both stand alone books and connected books in a series for the same reasons already mentioned. However, I've learned that if there are several books, I need to take notes (!) to keep details straight in my head. I loved The Ugly Duchess and marveled at Ms. James ability to bring these two very hurt and damaged young people the HEA they both needed and deserved. Loved this book! As for another fairy tale to be made into a romance, about Snow White and Rose Red?Two lovely heroines and two heroes, too! ��

    ReplyDelete
  18. I like standalones and I like connected stories. i think When Beauty Tamed the Beast will always be my favorite Eloisa book.

    Denise

    ReplyDelete